Date |
Name |
Girl |
Admin comments
|
| |
| 15/06/10 |
yoos |
|
sorry but we have no idea who yoos is.
its even a good review but she dont work on our gallery. sorry lads review rejected but sounds like we would love to have her working on our gallery. please only post for girls who are on our gallery thanks. |
| 15/06/10 |
yoos |
|
this was posted about a girl called Yoos. we dont have an escort named yoos on our gallery and can only suggest that if this is a girl from another agency that this review get posted on another review site. sorry.
and we had to censor the profanity sorry again. |
| 07/06/10 |
Big dillan - Remember me |
|
admin rejected this post as it was nothing to do with visiting an escort at all. rejected as blatant system abuse. action taken against this users IP address. |
| 31/05/10 |
paul |
grace |
admin rejects this london escorts review only because its a duplicate of one already posted. pesky submit button clicked twice, nothing to worry about. |
| 21/05/10 |
Franco |
Sophia |
nothing wrong with this feedback review its just that its a duplicated field report. exactly the same report has been accepted and posted to sophia's personal page if you want to read it. |
| 11/05/10 |
roberto |
asaka |
duplicate. rejected but only because its a duplicate of a previous feedback review that has already been posted. |
| 03/05/10 |
Jay |
|
accidental duplicate so rejected. The same review was already posted (sorry guys probably my fault for not approving the reviews quick enough in the first place. not enough hours in the day) |
| 01/05/10 |
jaykay |
Sophia |
unable to post as it purely arguementative in its construction and now far away from the point of visiting an escort. |
| 28/04/10 |
Dreamer |
gucci |
rejected review because the its a duplicate of a feedback review that has already been approved and posted. please ensure you only click the submit button once. London escorts agency admin. |
| 21/04/10 |
hussein |
|
rejected due to this being a revenge review after customer could not get a discount that he wanted. we guess that this means that only a fly on the wall would ever know the full truth but having spoken to the punter we would vere towards supporting the poor escort. sammi usually such a good girl. read this with a pinch of salt. |
| 20/04/10 |
hussein |
sammi |
rejected as suspected revenge review after a booking went not the way the ounter wanted it. |
| 02/04/10 |
renfriddan |
|
rejected as an obvious automated spam attempt |
| 23/03/10 |
ookiibob |
|
rejected. not enough infomration to know who is was referring to or find it on any diary. |
| 16/03/10 |
jimmy |
asia |
rejected escorts review because it was posted twice. |
| 10/01/10 |
Pcieannl |
|
come on guys if your going feedback your review you need to actually fill in all the fields. rejected as this post has nothing to tell. |
| 30/12/09 |
name |
|
rejected post. appears to be general spam possibly an automated spam post and definately nothing to do with booking one of our London Escorts. To post a genuine review on our feedback system you need to make a booking and actuall visit one of our girls guys. |
| 20/12/09 |
lun |
devon |
rejected only because it is a duplicate of an exact same post |
| 27/11/09 |
piloteer |
|
this feedback review has been rejected as it is nothing to do with a visit to any London Escorts on our agency and so of no use to genuine punters visiting this agency. |
| 23/11/09 |
|
asahi |
this an exact duplicate of a feedback already posted for asahi. |
| 21/11/09 |
Neil |
gina |
on review this feedback was rejected as we could not accurately associate it with an actual diary event. it was touch and go at one point if we should post it or if we should reject it but eventually we took the view that it was better not to take the chance and post something that may not be factual and lead genuine punters astray. |
| 16/11/09 |
sam |
|
rejected because there is no Escorts name. which means we are unable to post the review to an Escorts personal page. please fill in all the details when posting feedback to enable us to post correctly. |
| 14/11/09 |
Jim |
|
unfortunately we are rejecting this feedback as it does not emntion what the Escorts name was so we are unable to assign it to a particular Escorts personal page. In future please fill in all the fields as it makes it possible to post such reviews. Thanks. |
| 04/11/09 |
|
|
rejected for lacking any information for us to be able to match it to an actual diary event. please guys read the booking rules as without all the information its very difficult for us to work out if it is genuine post, or a genuine event. |
| 21/10/09 |
alexf955 |
|
this post has nothing to do with London Escorts, reviews or feedback and so is rejected. |
| 24/09/09 |
Tim |
|
rejected review. A great positive escorts review but without knowing who the escort was in question we are unable to post this as all feedack reviews allocate to the escorts personal page. To view more feedback for London Escorts visit the personal page of the escorts you prefer or see the latest posted reviews on our escorts agency home page. |
| 22/09/09 |
Director of Golf |
|
Rejected. dont mention which girl its for, there is no diary event for the supposed time of visit, it supposed to be posted by the director of golf which sounds bogus as 'Golf' is a model of a car not a make and a director would spell properly. the email address is invalid (we tried to email him to get his version of events) so we are unable to post this feedback hence rejected for possile fake escorts review. |
| 15/09/09 |
alexf784 |
|
im sorry alex this review system is intended to be used for posting a review of an escort working on this agency and although we appreciate you liking this site we have rejected your post. once you have visited a London Escort feel free to post your feedack here. |
| 15/09/09 |
QjCjjDdGLW |
|
rejected as spam, attempt to post a link to a medicine site. rejected because it has nothing to do with London Escorts on this agency. |
| 14/09/09 |
ncrKOUqWlgRNj |
|
rejected as spam atempt to post a link to a medicine site |
| 14/09/09 |
vsjYrQIjlFUIAgxny |
|
rejected spam attempt in which intended to post a link to a common male erectile dysfunction site. there is really no point as all such post will be rejected being nothing to do with escorts in London. |
| 14/09/09 |
VfNJDSWLVTeklEmFx |
|
rejected as spam for a viagra site |
| 05/08/09 |
|
|
this escorts feedback was rejected. no details were given so we cant match it to any escorts diary event. no name, no dates, no contact details nothing to be able to check validity. reected. please read the review posting rules. thanks. |
| 31/07/09 |
Pharmd27 |
|
rejected as it is unrelated to reviews on escorts in London or in fact anywhere else. feedback system is for posting your review of an actual visit to a London escort or a London escorts visit to you. this breaks the posting rules and has been rejected as a result. |
| 15/07/09 |
Alex |
mickie |
unable to trace what this report relates to. cant verify and match this report to an actual diary event for mickie London escorts. |
| 14/07/09 |
Shaf |
mickie |
Unable to find the record of this visit in our notes. Please remember to check and make sure your date and details are correct before posting. if we cant find it to verify it how can we accept your review? sorry if this seems annoying to the punter but if we post everything without checking then the reviews loose credibility. |
| 17/06/09 |
Mo |
|
unable to post this feedback review as there is no clue which escort it belongs to and wthout a mention of the escorts name impossible to even guess. please make sure you post the escorts name with each revew. thank you. |
| 31/05/09 |
Davde |
mickie |
rejected as records show the diary event was not genuine. cant say that this post is a fake for sure but the evidence doesnt match up and it looks suspect. rejected as a possible fake. |
| 28/05/09 |
BILLY |
|
this post breaks almost all our posting rules. rejected for way too many reasons to list. |
| 13/04/09 |
Eugene Strickland |
|
rejected for spam - unsolicited advert attempt trying to aquire tyhis sites services. |
| 08/04/09 |
Amsterdam Escort |
|
rejected because it was an attempt by another agency to post an advert in the feedback section. was not even a hidden attempt. strange ! |
| 17/03/09 |
MR_LONDONER |
|
well, we had no choice but to reject this post. for a start it says the visit occurred on the 27th march and as it was posted on the 17th of march seems impossible to review about an event in the future without a time machine! also he didnt give an escorts name, time of arrival, didnt give valid email address or his name so its impossible to match it up to a diary event anyway. in any case its in the future! cant express enough that if you cant give us anything to validate the review than its impossible to post. unable to accept that this review is genuine. appears fake. |
| 13/02/09 |
bigwilly |
|
this post is an abuse of the feedback system and has been rejected, the poster contacted and the the IP address recorded. This post was nothing to do with an actual diary event and so rejected. |
| 18/01/09 |
your Friend In London |
|
this post was found to be completely unrelated to feedback and unhelpfull to the punting public and was rejected as spam. |
| 11/01/09 |
Garry |
|
On review was not approved as kitty was removed from duty due to unethical conduct. So it does not appear likely that this feedback is genuine. Sorry but removed as not genuine. |
| 12/12/08 |
red1bull |
aisha |
admin were unble to find a match to an actual booking, we regretfully rejected this feedback. For more London escorts reviews see our home page for the latest or specific links from the girls personal page. |
| 17/11/08 |
mike Jackson |
|
We are unable to approve this review as this post is mostly blank with few of the required fields completed. |
| 08/11/08 |
artistlin |
Nisa |
admin has checked and there is no diary event booked in for nisa on 11th, in fact she was off duty. feedback rejected. |
| 06/11/08 |
Tom |
|
Dont know who this feedback was for, name field not completed. rejected. |
| 21/09/08 |
raj |
leona |
rejected - duplicate of an already sumitted review / feedback |
| 15/09/08 |
rider |
mickie |
on review this feedback was only rejected because it was duplicated. please press the send key only once. |
| 01/09/08 |
joe |
|
on review this feedback was rejected because the reviewer didnt allocate it to an escort, a time of visit or location. Feedback is posted to the escorts personal page when posted. Where can we post this? and we also need to be able to trace an actual event which requires the time and date and location fields completed.
Please guys, complete the fields properly or we cant do our bit. regards admin. |
| 30/08/08 |
JJ |
lydia |
On review, we were unable to confirm that this feedback is genuine. There is no diary event that matches it and our discretionary rules state every successful booking data is shredded and all other information destroyed between 1-2 weeks. We do this for your own privacy so your not embarrassed at a later date. unfortunately, that we means if you leave your review for over 3 weeks before you post it, we are unable to verify it.
Please guys, help us by posting regularly. if you leave for ages before you post how can we garauntee to every reader that its for real. |
| 27/08/08 |
Calgy69 |
|
on review this feedback matches an actual event and so appears genuine.
|
| 18/07/08 |
Bobby |
|
Admin has reviewed this feedback and it has NO information! come on guys, fill in every field please, we need the information to be able to match it up to an actual event!
What are we to do? hence this is rejected. - again, read the posting rules and complete the form properly. |
| 29/06/08 |
saad |
|
Admin has reviewed this feedback and rejects it because it does not match up with a diary event. Please remember to complete all the fields especially the girls name! Who is this a review for? cant allocate to a girl which makes matching it up to an actual event impossible. |
| 28/06/08 |
Mystery_person |
|
Admin has reviewed this feedback and rejects it becuase it does not match up with a diary event. Please remember guys, make sure you complete all the fields or we cant match it up to approve it. In this case the punter forgot to state which girl this is meant to be for. |
| 15/06/08 |
Naz |
lydia |
18th of may.. its so long ago that we are unable to check that this is a genuine event that naz was talking about. please guys, dont leave it over a month before you post feedback. In line with privacy commitments to our site visitors we destroy all records. Although this is a good thing for our clients in this case we have shot ourselves in the foot. Sorry unable to check this is genuine against our diary and we have no alternative but to reject this post. |
| 14/05/08 |
Iain |
lydia |
On review admin rejected this feedback. Lydia was given the chance to provide her opinion and we conculded that some of the information may not be genuine. No building work has ever taken place in her kitchen, and she doesnt live in edgware road either. Please guys double check your data before posting it. thanks. |
| 06/04/08 |
K |
|
Admin has reviewed this feedback and confirms that it matches an actual booking event. However we would like to point out that the punter has few words to say about this London escort. We suspect language skills to be the at the root of it. We have offered the gentleman the chance of updating this review by email. we are currently still waiting for a reply. |
| 31/03/08 |
experienced punter |
Natalie |
Admin has reviewed this feedback and has found that there is no diary booking to match it against. There is no booking of this name at any time on the 27th march or several days either side. An email requesting the name used at the time of booking and more information has been sent but currently, experienced punter has not replied. Neither has he provided a contact number to discuss the discrepancies found by the admin team. We cant confirm this post is genuine and reject it. |